Haiku – Environmentalist
My skin is a rock /
My soul belongs to the Earth /
Mother nature is my love…
My skin is a rock /
My soul belongs to the Earth /
Mother nature is my love…
Many countries introduced new laws and programs designed to help individuals and families to save energy, and to live in homes having a smaller carbon print. With the increasing worries about global warming and energy consumption, people are more and more interested about the subject.
The effects of uncontrolled increasing energy consumption might threaten the existence of humankind, especially in large cities and areas of the world that are heavily industrialized. In the past, these matters were of no major concern. Today, the increased rhythm of development imposed new qualitative requests from modern people.
Eco-Friendly houses – houses of the future
A building is considered green if by design, construction materials used, and technologies, reduce energy consumption and the negative impact on the environment. The concept does not apply only to buildings that integrate nature, but it has to be expanded to the old buildings and building concepts as well.
A greenhouse can be one build of eco-friendly materials, but old buildings are just as suited for being renovated to integrate environment-friendly elements. It has many advantages, including the faster building time and the reduced costs with energy consumption on the long term. The main characteristics of these houses are the natural materials that they are built of and the capacity to obtain solar energy for electricity and heating. However, a green house is a lot more than an eco-friendly passive house. Modern eco-friendly houses and appliances like microwaves and ovens are almost intelligent, with efficient insulation and recycling capacities such as a system to reuse rain water.
Even if the materials used to build such homes are sometimes cheaper, the overall costs which include highly skilled labor are higher. However, considering the lower thermal exchange coefficient these houses have with the exterior environment, they will save money on the long term. Plus, the capacity of self-ventilation of these houses makes them a lot more pleasant to live in.
The eco-friendly qualities of a house are measured by its capacity to protect natural resources and to satisfy high demands of its inhabitants in terms of comfort and health:
Building an eco-house
While a common house consumes natural resources and throws waste in the environment, an eco-house protects the environment and it integrates in it perfectly. It means efficient lighting and unconventional building materials used, such as solar panels, heating pumps and wind turbines. However, it also depends on where the house is built. For the eco-houses built in areas where sun shines across the year, it is easier to use solar panels. In countries where sun is sparser, the energy of the wind can be used with the same efficiency.
Energy can also be saved though a smart design of the house and this is why the architecture of these houses is usually unique. The cost of designing the house is sometimes the biggest if you are planning to contract someone to build such a house for you.…
Saving the environment shouldn’t be seen as something so phenomenal, because if seen that way, doing it would mean so much resolution and hard work. Saving the environment is simply going back to the basics. It is simply remembering how uncomplicated we used to live, how we never knew fast-food, how we chewed our food slowly and talked over dinner, how we patiently rose from our couch or bed to change the tv channel.
There are several opportunities available to every individual at any time of the day to help save mother earth. These are absolutely not-scary ways that anyone is capable of doing.
First, we should remember to savor each moment. There is no need to rush even if there are a hundred and one deadlines to beat. We think more clearly and more intelligently when not rushed or stressed, hence, walking or biking to work shouldn’t be such a silly idea. We should use the stairs more often and the elevators and escalators only in the event of dire need or extremely weak knees. Motorized vehicles, as well as elevators and escalators that consume too much energy, were invented for faster movement but are not meant to completely substitute human physical exertion.
Second, we should take time to breathe and smell earth in its true form. Thus, we must try to lessen our dependence on climate-controlled rooms. Air-conditioning units use too much electricity and energy. After all, sweating is good for expelling toxins from our body.
Third, we should start remembering the joys of cooking at home and enjoying meals served on a regular dinner table. Hence, we should let go of drive-throughs and of Starbucks coffee while going to or from work. By doing so, we use regular dining utensils rather than styrofoam and plastic utensils that harm the environment.
Fourth, we must begin to relive those days when we used to spend our weekends and holidays in the park or in our village streets playing regular games and just biking around. Hence, we must try to stay out of enormous climate-controlled malls with innumerable fast-food restos that use styrofoam and plastic dining utensils.
Fifth, we become children again who sweat under the sun, run in the rain, and drink water from the faucet. Thus, we must endeavor to stop buying bottled water in the hope of slowly diminishing the use of plastic bottles.
Sixth, we cease to be wasteful and start to reuse and recycle items in the house. If there are unused clothing, shoes, tools, and furniture, we put up a garage sale or donate them to the less fortunate so these items that have lost their usefulness to us will be put to good use by others.
Seventh, we use a lot of imagination and creativity on how to put to good use old and dusty stuff in the house, in the garden, or in the dirty kitchen. Perhaps we can come up with an art form out of some old buttons and frames, and display that imaginative art form in our living room as an ode to the environment.
Eighth, we learn a little from the indigenous people, who believe that nature is the source of all life and wisdom. We therefore respect nature by always remembering to dispose of our trash properly, “greening-up” our own yard, and helping trees grow abundantly.
Ninth, the refrigerator is a huge consumer of electricity. It would be a wonderful opportunity to market or harvest from our own garden what our body needs for the day, and give the fridge some rest day. As all the …
Crime, and deviance from the norms of society may be as old as human society itself, but criminology, or the study of crime, remains relatively young. Among the groundbreaking work in criminology from the sociological perspective that was done in the early twentieth century is the social disorganization theory, which was propagated by sociologists such as W.I. Thomas, Florian Znaiecki, Robert Park and Ernest Burgess, among others (Schmalleger, p. 208).
Social disorganization theory credits a lack of, or diminishment of “the influence of existing social rules of behavior upon the individual member of the group” as a primary cause of criminal behavior and deviance (Keel, 2008). The early proponents of social disorganization theory, specifically Florian Znaiecki and W.I. Thomas, examined the effects of social upheaval and conflict upon crime, by studying the high crimes rates in communities of Polish immigrants in Chicago (Schmalleger, p. 208).
The main idea of the initial work in social disorganization theory was that these new immigrants, who found themselves displaced and occupying a new role in the social structure of their community, were unable to maintain their grasp on social norms (Schmalleger, p. 207). The effects of displacement into the new community, where most certainly immigrants who had perhaps been prominent or successful in their mother country, now found themselves at the bottom of the socio-economic structure, led them in some cases to commit crimes.
While the actual physical displacement of immigrants and the subsequent loss of norms that occurred featured prominently into the earliest forays into social disorganization theory, later work focused on criminal activity in relation to the environment, or community, which became known as social ecology (Schmalleger, p. 208). As this was being studied primarily out of the University of Chicago, the sociologists who studied crime in the rapidly changing city of Chicago became known as the Chicago School of Criminology (Schmalleger, p. 209).
Robert Park and Edward Burgess studied crime in the community by dividing the city into areas, divided up into concentric zones (Schmalleger, p. 208). These included residential zones, working class neighborhoods, business districts, and what they referred to as transition zones, which were often areas of low income, dilapidated housing, that often contained abandoned buildings, and where in a state of transition from residential to business uses (Schmalleger, p. 208). It was in these transition zones that crime rates were the highest. The ecological approach was further articulated by Henry McKay and Clifford Shaw, who developed the idea that crime becomes attached to specific geographic areas in a community (Schmalleger, p. 209).
When immigrants who populated the transition zones became economically successful they moved outwards towards residential districts or suburbs, and the vacancies they created were filled by immigrants who had just arrived (Schmalleger, p. 209). This new group experienced the same social displacement issues that served to create a continuation of criminal activity, and was referred to by Shaw and McKay as cultural transmission (Schmalleger, p. 209). This effectively demonstrated a relationship between criminal activity and geographical location in a community, regardless of the ethnicity of the groups resided there.
While much of the social disorganization theorists dealt in terms that seem ethnocentric, it is important to note that they were working in Chicago in the 1920’s and 1930’s, which was a city with a large immigrant population during a period of elevated immigration into the United States. These concepts, to my mind, can be applied to any city, and any ethnicity, as well. The social pressures that are prominent in social disorganization concepts, such as “Social change, social conflict, and the lack of social consensus,” can …
Environmentalists and laissez-faire capitalists have formed an unholy alliance in order to deindustrialize the economy. Laissez-faire capitalists do not like the amount of money that has to be spent paying employees for work that machines can do. If there are fewer people working at the machines, this means more profits and you certainly don’t have to worry about that stupid OSHA if you take workers out of the equation.
Environmentalists are the kind of people who truly think that the world would be a better place if we did not use energy and thus did not try to make things. A true environmentalist would not be happy if we did everything we could to end the Industrial Revolution; they claim that they would be happy with the end of the Industrial Revolution and the creation of machine. I personally think they are lying. I feel that they would not be happy with any society–certainly not an agrarian society. The people who are environmental radicals want to kill the jerk who invented work. I can understand what the motives are of the laissez-faire folks are, but I can’t always say what the motives of the radical environmentalists are. I suspect some of them are motivated by an expansion of the public sector and feigned compassion via the welfare state and dependency.
Laissez-faire believers are beholden to either a stupid or naïve few that the world would be better off if we just ignore each other’s problems and whether or not anyone had employment/a sense of dignity.
This is an unholy alliance that has effectively destroyed the middle class in America and any nation that has a decent living standard for their citizens. People say, “Well, this can’t be an alliance if they don’t know about it.” This may be true, but there is an end result that is going to occur. Both groups seem comfortable with promoting the service sector as an alternative, but you have to plug in computers and still pay employees to do this, so I think both groups are again lying when they promote this as an alternative.
I am an agnostic. I make no apology for that. I do believe in freedom of worship, no matter how incorrect I may find you to be. I think many followers of laissez-faire economics adopt a certain level of moral relativity in order to justify their views. These people replace God and faith with the almighty dollar. I tend to believe that many of the radical environmental replace God and faith with Earth. I think replacing God and faith with the almighty dollar is wrong. I think replacing God and faith with Earth is wrong. I replace God and faith with the joy that I get from being able to work and trying to solve the problems of others. I guess I believe in my country as well and I hope the best for it. I would hope other people would adopt some sort of opinion that is similar. They do not have to however; who am I to tell people what to believe in? No one. Moral relativism kind of creates an opportunity for a person not to believe in anything. I guess the debate will continue.…
Behind every progressive movement for change offered by the present administration, one has to look deep and see what is this all about.You look at the outward message and then you ask the people who do the work, “How is this going to effect the health and safety of the American People?” Afterall, is that not the purpose of government to look after the public good?
Well, this latest piece of “newspeak” comes on the eve of the Labor Day Weekend 2006. The latest budget is going to cut the EPA library budget by 2 million dollars. The figure is not significant when you consider the costs of our numerous war efforts runs about that 2 million every 10 minutes of every day, but it is significant when this little drop in the bucket is an 80% cut. This leaves the EPA with about $800,000 to run all of its data collection, preservation, retrieval , administrative costs for an entire year.
The “newspeak” is that this cut is because the public is not using the libraries due to heightened security. The documents and reports are being digitalized and it is just more efficient. In fact the cuts will mean no public access. The cuts do not allow for the cost of dizitalizing all of these documents which is the size of the Rocky Mountains. The cuts also mean the preemptive closing of EPA library facilities in anticipation of these cuts.
The Public Employees for the Environment have tried within their of control to stop the closures. The scientist have sent pleading letters to the Congress begging for the funds and to stop the closures. See the letter to Conrad Burns the Committee Chairman http://www.peer.org/docs/epa/06_29_6_union_library_ltr.pdf
Across this great nation there are superfund sites dependent on the latest and historical data to keep the American people safe in their drinking water, air, and habitat. It would seem that even if you disagree with the concept of Global Warming or the possibility of harmful chemicals creating a toxic unliveable planet. burning the book is a harsh measure. As a member of the public while I may not travel today or tomorrow to a public library of the EPA, I would certainly like to know it is there.…
Since being home, I have had the pleasure of going to art events around town. Out of all the exhibits I saw in Coral Gables, Florida there was one that really stood out among the rest of them: the PIAG Museum’s exhibit entitled “Earth & Water, our planet, our life.”
There were several things that made this exhibit so unique. First, there was the message behind it all. The theme is the environment. The purpose is to create awareness. Secondly, the medium which the artists use is very original. Each artist that enters is required to paint on a cube (made of non toxic material of course) that is 12″x12″x12″. The cube is painted on 5 sides and will float in the water on the dates and locations that are chosen by the PIAG Museum.
The most amazing part about the exhibit is that it is meant to bring together artists from around the world united in their commitment to take action to save our planet. The PIAG Museum is requesting thousands of artists of all respects to participate in this event. Whether you are a writer, painter, singer, photographer, or a designer the PIAG Museum wants your talent for this exhibition.
This exhibition has been hosted at several locations across South Florida such as Fair Child Tropical Gardens and the Miami Dade Cultural Center. The exhibit was also hosted by Disney World in which floating cubes were spread out across the waters of Epcot Center. Eventually the PAIG Museum hopes to take this exhibit to Washington D.C.
If you are interested in participating in this one of a kind event, or if you just want to find an exhibit near you, you can find all of the information you need at the PIAG Museum website. This truly is an amazing opportunity to show your love for the arts as well as the planet.
Gun Control? is it Possible in Today’s Gun Loving Climate?
Framing is an art. When an idea or ideal is “framed” well, we believe it. We feel it. Think of framing as using a word or a series of words to frame a picture in your mind, one that is pleasurable, painful, or frightening. Politicians are masters of this art. Republicans used the words “death panels” to frighten voters just as Obama used the words “horses and bayonets” in a debate to reinforce his slogan of “move forward, not back”.
Gun advocates use words like patriotism and civil liberties as framing tools. It’s very powerful and effective. Just read the comments after articles such as “Obama to press for policy changes after shooting”. One user states, “Whenever Obama offers a solution, it is another newly instated law that will infringe on one’s liberties and individual rights.” Of course, gun advocacy isn’t as simple as just using framing language. The gun manufacturing industry alone is a multi-billion dollar powerhouse, fold in the millions the NRA spends for lobbying and that is one huge gun-proponent brick wall. That type of cash gets politicians elected and moves legislation.
Nevertheless, gun control — or even a ban on assault weapons — would seem a slam-dunk after the horrific mass murder of little children in Connecticut. Surprisingly, one of the biggest responses was from gun lovers. Sales of gun soared — as is typical after a mass shooting — in the days following the CT massacre. Supposedly, the rush to purchase was due to fear of gun control. However, this is just a continuation of an upsurge in gun ownership. According to an article in the Guardian there have been more …
When running a green, eco-friendly business, working your environmental stance into your marketing is important for projecting your business’s image. Here are a few ideas for marketing your business in a greener way!
Paper-based marketing, including flyers and posters, can be highly effective. Unfortunately, a large percentage of the paper used for these marketing tools will be destined for the landfill. Avoid excessive paper waste in your marketing by instead using practical items to promote your business. Things like ink pens and refrigerator magnets are useful things that are far less likely to be thrown away. Not only will this help reduce your environmental impact by saving natural resources, but it will give your advertising more longevity as well. A flyer will probably be thrown away and forgotten within a few days, whereas an item like a pen will be around for weeks, months, or even years. This means that your company logo and information will also be there, bringing your business to mind on a regular basis.
Be selective in your advertising. Look for places to advertise and market your business where green-minded folks will see your ads, such as alternative newspapers. Try to advertise only in print media that uses at least some recycled paper in their printing. If your favorite local publications do not use recycled paper, you should encourage them to do so!
Always look for ways to add value to what would otherwise be considered garbage. For instance, many stores have coupons printed on the reverse side of their cash register receipt paper. There is usually a number to call in order to inquire about purchasing ad space here. Look for businesses like health food stores or other places where environmentally conscious people shop and see if they use this kind of receipts.
Offering your customers special green services will help draw them to your business. For example, you could purchase a TechnoTrash can from GreenDisk to offer your patrons a way to recycled things like printer ink cartridges, old floppy disks, and other used-up or outdated technology. Advertise that you have these services available. Green-minded people will often use businesses that go the extra mile with services like this. Offering extra green services to your customers will help retain a loyal customer base, as well as draw in new customers who are excited to see your commitment to the environment.
Thinking “outside the box” and using a little creative ingenuity in your marketing will help to project your image as an environmentally friendly business!…
I called to the mountains
but they didn’t reply.
Perhaps the distance truncates
the force of my lamentations.
Or perhaps they don’t care;
I belong to a race of terracidal maniacs
who’ve killed her kin.
Likewise the flowing waters
strain to avoid my legs, kicking at
perhaps marking it as insult to injury,
striking the earth when she is down.
We are porcelain and too dainty
My hands coated in red dirt
is phony: I’m a closeted urbanite
I should bake myself
in the sun. I should bury myself
in hay and clippings.
I should….but I won’t.
There is work to be done.…
The endless string of red ruby taillights, like a necklace outlining the curves of a sleeping beauty does not incite pleasurable images, rather it sends me into a rage. “How dare you cause a traffic jam in my mountains,” I scream in typical Coloradoan road rage. I swerve off to a frontage road only to get stuck behind Denver plates going under the speed limit. “Must be from California or Texas,” I fume as I yank my mother’s three-quarter ton pick-up into the on-coming lane to pass on a blind corner. It’s a normal Sunday drive home from work, taking an hour and a half to travel fifteen miles. I’m livid by the time I get home.
I am a native, said with condescension and righteous snobbery; born and raised (by my transplanted Californian mother) in Colorado’s beautiful mountains. I remember when Vail and Eagle were separate towns. I remember skiing when snowboarders were dangerous herds of out-of-control kids, before terrain parks and sick jibbers. I learned to drive on the switchbacks of Fall River Road, and lost kids in my high school to the unprotected cliffs of Oh My God Road. These mountains thirty miles west of Denver are my mountains.
Back in Colorado for a post-college internship, after spending four years attempting to pry open my mind, I was conflicted in a new way. They were still my mountains; but my driver’s license had Oregon written across the top. Still a native I get pulled over so the cop can verify that I am my mother’s daughter, and oh how I’d grown. I now understand economy and the need to relocate for the numerous reasons that life proposes, but my mountains are being trampled by thousands of summer-heat melting Denverites. Heading west and up to break from city heat, they hike off trails increasing erosion; they start camp fires without rings, not putting them out completely; they invade small tourist towns making daily life for residents nearly impossible; their kids graffiti rocks; their trash floats down creeks; their million dollar houses destroy entire mountain slopes, creating uninteresting views and displacing wildlife. They are destroying the mountains that I love. It seemed an unstoppable spiral motivated by an unreasonable expectation of ownership (theirs and mine) and economics.
Then I saw Colorado 1870-2000, by William H. Jackson & John Fielder. This photo history of Colorado compared landscape photos taken by Jackson in the 1800’s with photos taken by Fielder from the same spots in 2000. The comparisons showed once seemingly booming towns, now empty meadows desecrated by harsh winters or wildfires. Growing population centers then, now Lake Dillon. For pages the then and now photos showed me that though I worried for my docile mountains, they always had the upper hand. Blizzards; rock, mud and snow slides; floods, fire, wind, and draught have kept man’s transgressions in check far as long as man has attempted to inhabit the folds of the Rockies and conquer their peaks.
Once in a while out-of-town drivers force a scream from behind my steering wheel for their incessant braking, but now I worry less for my powerful mountains loved my Mother Nature herself, and I laugh when I hear of her demolishing storms and construction thwarting weather and plate movements. Millions of years from now, she will be here and we will not, and I’m ok with that.…